-ln(1-Xt))-0.six -1.-0.6 -1.-0.2 -0.41 43 45 47-0.two -0.41 43 45 47-
-ln(1-Xt))-0.6 -1.-0.6 -1.-0.2 -0.41 43 45 47-0.two -0.41 43 45 47-1.4 -0.two 0.0 0.two 0.4 0.6 0.eight 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.six 1.eight 2.0 2.2 -1.log t41 -1.4 43 -0.two 0.0 0.two 0.4 0.six -1.0 1.0 1.2 1.four 1.6 1.8 two.0 0.8 45 log t 4741 43 45 47 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.four 1.-1.four -0.two 0.0 0.two 0.four 0.six 0.eight 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.-1.four -0.0.0.0.0.log t0.six 0.log t0.6 0.(d) Figure five. 5. Avrami(c) ofof (a) PHS, (b) PHS/CNC0.25, (c) PHS/CNC0.five,and (d) PHS/CNC1. Figure Compound 48/80 Technical Information Avrami plots (a) PHS, (b) PHS/CNC0.25, (c) PHS/CNC0.5, and (d) PHS/CNC1. plots-0.two -0.six -1.0 -1.4 -0.2 0.0 0.Table 1 lists the summary of Avrami parameters for PHS and PHS/CNC composites. Table 1 lists the summary of Avrami parameters for PHS and PHS/CNC compos -0.2 Irrespective of Tc and CNC content material, n slightly varied amongst two.five and 3.3. The average n Regardless of Tc and CNC content material, n slightly varied in between two.five and three.three. The avera (2.85) was close to three, indicating that PHS/CNC composites and PHS crystallized through (two.85) was close to three, indicating that PHS/CNC composites and PHS crystallized thro -0.six the exact same crystallization mechanism inside the investigated Tc variety, i.e., an athermal 41 41 43 nucleation and43 three-dimensional truncated sphere development mechanism [40]. -1.0 45 45 For each sample, the k values progressively improved using the decrease in Tc , indicating a 47 47 shorter time frame required -1.4 full crystallization. At the very same Tc , the k values to -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.four 0.six 0.eight 1.0 1.two 1.four 1.six 0.4 0.six 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.eight enhanced with CNC content, suggesting that CNC promoted the crystallization of PHS.log tlog(-ln(1-Xt))log(-ln(1-Xt))log tFigure 5. Avrami plots of (a) PHS, (b) PHS/CNC0.25, (c) PHS/CNC0.5, and (d) PHS/CNC1.Table 1 lists the summary of Avrami parameters for PHS and PHS/CNC composites. No matter Tc and CNC content material, n slightly varied between 2.five and 3.three. The average n (2.85) was close to three, indicating that PHS/CNC composites and PHS crystallized throughthe similar crystallization mechanism inside the investigated Tc variety, i.e., an athermal nucleation and three-dimensional truncated sphere growth mechanism [40].Polymers 2021, 13,Table 1. Summary of Avrami parameters of PHS and PHS/CNC composites. n k (min ) Tc 41 two.9 three.58 10-2 43 two.8 three.75 10-3 PHS Table 1. Summary of Avrami parameters of PHS and PHS/CNC composites. 45 three.1 1.88 10-4 three.1 n 1.22 10-5 Samples T c (47 C) k (min-n ) 41 two.8 7.61 10-2 41 two.9 3.58 10-2 43 three.3 3.82 10-3 43 two.eight 3.75 10-3 PHS/CNC0.25 PHS 45 three.0 eight.19 10-4 45 3.1 1.88 10-4 2.9 three.1 1.05 1.22 10-5 10-4 4747 41 2.7 1.07 10-1 -2 4143 two.eight 2.7 1.39 7.61 10-3 10-2 PHS/CNC0.5 43 3.three three.82 ten 45 three.1 eight.58 10-4 PHS/CNC0.25 45 3.0 eight.19 10-4 47 2.7 three.01 10-4 47 2.9 1.05 10-4 41 2.six 1.38 10-1 -1 4143 2.five 2.7 3.41 1.07 ten 10-2 -2 PHS/CNC1 4345 two.8 two.7 2.53 1.39 10-4 10-3 PHS/CNC0.5 45 three.1 47 two.6 1.04 8.58 10-4 10-3 47 2.7 3.01 ten Samples-n7 of41 two.six For each sample, the k values gradually elevated using the reduce in 1.38indicating Tc, ten 43 two.5 In the similar Tc3.41 10-2 a shorter PHS/CNC1 time frame needed to complete crystallization. , the k values 45 2.8 two.53 10-3 enhanced with CNC content material, suggesting that CNC promoted the crystallization of PHS.3 47 2.6 1.04 10- To accurately discover the influence of Tc and CNC content, crystallization half-time (t0.5), the time to reach 50 of the final crystallinity, was employed within this PSB-603 In Vivo investigation. On the basis To accurately discover the derived in the above Avrami equation, t0.5 was calcuof the following equation, which isinfluence of Tc and.