Ortant is thought to be HP infection, which is an evident risk factor for peptic ulcer diseases [30], and also an apparent preventive marker for reflux esophagitis [31]. From the standpoint of confounding variables, effects of coffee consumptionNo Relation of Coffee with Peptic Ulcer and GERDupon the four upper gastrointestinal disorders should be carefully evaluated, as some reports denoted that coffee intake presents considerable association with HP infection, obesity, smoking, or alcohol drinking [32?4]. As the subjects of our present study mostly AKT inhibitor 2 web composed of Japanese, 10457188 who are known to be very high prevalence of HP infection [35] and also known to be considerably high rate of smokers [36], a detailed investigation considering the effects of these confounding factors should be conducted.Materials and Methods Study PopulationStudy participants were 9,517 adults who received a medical checkup at Kameda Medical Center Makuhari from October 2010 to September 2011. In this study, all the participants wereasked to respond to the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD (FSSG) [37] and also respond to the detailed questionnaire below-mentioned. They also underwent a variety of examinations such as upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, abdominal ultrasonography, blood chemistry tests, chest X-ray, physical examinations, and so on. The gender breakdown of participants was 5,675 men (51.568.8 years old, range 20 to 82 years) and 3,842 women (50.368.7 years old, range 20 to 87 years). This study was approved by the ethics committees of the University of Tokyo, and written informed consent was obtained from each subject according to the Declaration of ASP-015K site Helsinki.Figure 1. Study recruitment flowchart. Of the 9,517 healthy adults, we excluded subjects with prior gastric surgery (111), taking PPIs and/or H2RAs (493), and having history of Helicobacter pylori eradication (900). Among the eligible 8,013 subjects, numbers of subjects with GU, DU, RE, NERD, and other subjects free from the four major upper gastrointestinal disorders are shown. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065996.gNo Relation of Coffee with Peptic Ulcer and GERDTable 1. Characteristics of the study population and univariate analysis of risk factors for coffee.Drinker N = 5,451 N ( ) Age ,40 40?9 50?9 60?9 70# Mean(6SD) Sex female male BMI ,18.5 18.5?4.9 302 (63.7) 3,921 (68.9) 1,228 (66.6) 22.9 (63.2) 3,194 (67.5) 2,257 (67.5) 626 (67.6) 1,937 (72.7) 2,265 (69.0) 583 (57.1) 40 (33.3) 49.8 (68.2)Non-drinker N = 2,562 N ( )p-value300 (32.4) 727 (27.3) 1,017 (31.0) 438 (42.9) 80 (66.7) 51.5 (69.7),0.001*{,0.001*`1,476 (32.5) 1,086 (32.5)0.{172 (36.3) 1,772 (31.1) 618 (33.4) 23.1 (63.5)0.020*{Figure 2. A venn diagram showing numbers of the four acidrelated upper gastrointestinal disorders in our cohort. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065996.g25# Mean(6SD) PG-I/PG-II0.`Diagnoses of the Four Acid-related Upper Gastrointestinal DisordersGastric ulcer (GU) and duodenal ulcer (DU) were diagnosed by endoscopy. In the present study, only active ulcers were considered as GU or DU respectively. Peptic ulcer (PU) was defined as the presence of GU and/or DU. Reflux esophagitis (RE) was also diagnosed by endoscopy, according to the modified Los Angeles (LA) classification [38]. Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) was defined as the presence of heartburn and/or acid regurgitation among the subjects with no esophageal mucosal break [39]. To evaluate the symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation, two questions in the a.Ortant is thought to be HP infection, which is an evident risk factor for peptic ulcer diseases [30], and also an apparent preventive marker for reflux esophagitis [31]. From the standpoint of confounding variables, effects of coffee consumptionNo Relation of Coffee with Peptic Ulcer and GERDupon the four upper gastrointestinal disorders should be carefully evaluated, as some reports denoted that coffee intake presents considerable association with HP infection, obesity, smoking, or alcohol drinking [32?4]. As the subjects of our present study mostly composed of Japanese, 10457188 who are known to be very high prevalence of HP infection [35] and also known to be considerably high rate of smokers [36], a detailed investigation considering the effects of these confounding factors should be conducted.Materials and Methods Study PopulationStudy participants were 9,517 adults who received a medical checkup at Kameda Medical Center Makuhari from October 2010 to September 2011. In this study, all the participants wereasked to respond to the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD (FSSG) [37] and also respond to the detailed questionnaire below-mentioned. They also underwent a variety of examinations such as upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, abdominal ultrasonography, blood chemistry tests, chest X-ray, physical examinations, and so on. The gender breakdown of participants was 5,675 men (51.568.8 years old, range 20 to 82 years) and 3,842 women (50.368.7 years old, range 20 to 87 years). This study was approved by the ethics committees of the University of Tokyo, and written informed consent was obtained from each subject according to the Declaration of Helsinki.Figure 1. Study recruitment flowchart. Of the 9,517 healthy adults, we excluded subjects with prior gastric surgery (111), taking PPIs and/or H2RAs (493), and having history of Helicobacter pylori eradication (900). Among the eligible 8,013 subjects, numbers of subjects with GU, DU, RE, NERD, and other subjects free from the four major upper gastrointestinal disorders are shown. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065996.gNo Relation of Coffee with Peptic Ulcer and GERDTable 1. Characteristics of the study population and univariate analysis of risk factors for coffee.Drinker N = 5,451 N ( ) Age ,40 40?9 50?9 60?9 70# Mean(6SD) Sex female male BMI ,18.5 18.5?4.9 302 (63.7) 3,921 (68.9) 1,228 (66.6) 22.9 (63.2) 3,194 (67.5) 2,257 (67.5) 626 (67.6) 1,937 (72.7) 2,265 (69.0) 583 (57.1) 40 (33.3) 49.8 (68.2)Non-drinker N = 2,562 N ( )p-value300 (32.4) 727 (27.3) 1,017 (31.0) 438 (42.9) 80 (66.7) 51.5 (69.7),0.001*{,0.001*`1,476 (32.5) 1,086 (32.5)0.{172 (36.3) 1,772 (31.1) 618 (33.4) 23.1 (63.5)0.020*{Figure 2. A venn diagram showing numbers of the four acidrelated upper gastrointestinal disorders in our cohort. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065996.g25# Mean(6SD) PG-I/PG-II0.`Diagnoses of the Four Acid-related Upper Gastrointestinal DisordersGastric ulcer (GU) and duodenal ulcer (DU) were diagnosed by endoscopy. In the present study, only active ulcers were considered as GU or DU respectively. Peptic ulcer (PU) was defined as the presence of GU and/or DU. Reflux esophagitis (RE) was also diagnosed by endoscopy, according to the modified Los Angeles (LA) classification [38]. Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) was defined as the presence of heartburn and/or acid regurgitation among the subjects with no esophageal mucosal break [39]. To evaluate the symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation, two questions in the a.
Comments are closed.